Book LibraryPhilosophyPersonal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy Book Cover

Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy Book Summary

by Michael Polanyi
20.0 minutes

Downloaded from Z-Library https://z-library.sk

This page condenses Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy into a quick summary with author background, historical context, and chapter takeaways so you can understand Michael Polanyi's core ideas faster.

Book Facts

Only verified fields from this page are shown here.

Title
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Author
Michael Polanyi
Reading Time
20.0 minutes
Category
Philosophy
Audio
Not available

Quick Answers

Start with the most useful search-style answers about Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy.

What is Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy about?

Downloaded from Z-Library https://z-library.sk

Who is Michael Polanyi?

Michael Polanyi was a Hungarian-British polymath, trained as a physical chemist, who later became a philosopher of science.

Who should read Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy?

Philosophers, scientists, and anyone interested in epistemology and the philosophy of science.

What is the background behind Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy?

Written in the mid-20th century, the book challenges the prevailing positivist and objectivist views of science, reflecting the broader intellectual c...

Key Points

MindMap

Target Audience

Philosophers, scientists, and anyone interested in epistemology and the philosophy of science.

Author Background

Michael Polanyi was a Hungarian-British polymath, trained as a physical chemist, who later became a philosopher of science. His work focused on tacit knowledge and the role of personal beliefs in scientific discovery.

Historical Context

Written in the mid-20th century, the book challenges the prevailing positivist and objectivist views of science, reflecting the broader intellectual currents questioning the foundations of knowledge and rationality.

Chapter Summary